InfoWorld AI·
If you came up building software in the 1990s or early 2000s, you remember the visceral satisfaction of determinism. You wrote code. The compiler analyzed it, optimized it, and emitted precisely the machine instructions you expected. Same input, same output. Every single time. There was an engineering rigor to it that shaped how an entire generation of developers thought about building systems. Then large language models (LLMs) arrived and, almost overnight, code generation became a stochastic process. Prompt an AI model twice with identical inputs and you’ll get structurally different outputs—sometimes brilliant, sometimes subtly broken, occasionally hallucinated beyond repair. For quick prototyping that’s fine. For enterprise-grade software—the kind where a misplaced null check costs you a production outage at 2am—it’s a non-starter. We stared at this problem for a while. And then something clicked. It felt familiar, like a pattern we’d encountered before, buried somewhere in our CS
Read full articleAI Code Generation in ADLC: Faster Dev Without Quality Loss The post AI Code Generation Inside ADLC: How It Cuts Dev Time Without Cutting Quality appeared first on Spritle software.
